The media frenzy to destroy good, decent Americans who oppose a 15-story mega-mosque on Ground Zero is rabid. Even for them. Despite red flags everywhere and the nationwide grief caused by this grotesque act of Islamic supremacism, why isn't the media doing its job, investigative journalism?
Instead, the morally ill media is in full-on operational smear machine mode in the raging war of ideas, the information battle space, the objective of which is to erect the Ground Zero mega mosque. Tolerance is a crime when applied to evil (Thomas Mann). Whilst the NY Times front page spins interfaith yarns into PR gold faster than Rumpelstiltskin and accords godlike status to Imam Feisal Rauf, new audio surfaces. Here are a couple of soundbites of tolerance:
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf: "We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al Qaida has on its hands of innocent non Muslims. You may remember that the US-led sanctions against Iraq led to the death of over half a million Iraqi children. This has been documented by the United Nations. And when Madeleine Albright, who has become a friend of mine over the last couple of years, when she was Secretary of State and was asked whether this was worth it, said it was worth it.
No mention of the 270 million victims of over a millennium of jihadi wars, land appropriations, cultural annihilation and enslavement. No mention of the recent slaughter by Muslims of Christians, Hindus, Jews, non-believers in Indonesia, Thailand, Ethiopia, Somalia, Philippines, Lebanon, Israel, Russia, China................ no candor, no criticism of Islam.
Imam Feisal: "The West needs to begin to see themselves through the eyes of the Arab and Muslim world, and when you do you will see the predicament that exists within the Muslim community."
On the question of reforming Islam and expunging the texts of the threat doctrine and mandated violence and conquest:
Imam Feisal: On the issue of the reformation, in terms of what is again intended by it, Islam does not need a reformation.
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf: "So men will say: women, you know, they're emotional, ..... whatever, whatever, and women will say: men, they're brutes, insensitive, etcetera, and you have the beginning of a gender conflict. If gender is not what distinguishes us we'll look at skin colouring and say: n#####s or whities, or whatever"
Reverend Al Sharpton was unavailable for comment. Too busy endorsing the Islamic supremacist mosque. Rest assured, the tolerant Imam Rauf will not suffer as Dr. Laura did (and she was making a "word" point, Rauf is using it.)
Imam Feisal: And when we observe terrorism, whether it was done by the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka or by al Qaida or whoever is behind the bombings in London or those in Madrid
Note, when he says about the London and Madrid bombings,that was five days after the London attacks and over a year after Madrid. It was common knowledge who the perps were at that time.
IMAM FEISAL ABDUL RAUF: That's a very common question. In fact, just about two months ago I was interviewed by Barbara Walters, who is doing a special on heaven and she's interviewed suicide bombers who are expecting the embraces of 72 virgins in paradise, and she asked me do women get the same privilege as well, and I answered her telling her: well, the Koran says you shall have whatever your heart desires
And the Imam is conspiracy theorist - 911 was an inside job:
How many of you have seen the documentary: Fahrenheit 911? The vast majority - at least half here. Do you remember the scene of the Iraqi woman whose house was bombed and she was just screaming, "What have they done." Now, I don't know, you don't know Arabic but in Arabic it was extremely powerful. Her house was gone. Her husband, I think, was killed. What wrong did he do? I found myself weeping when I watched that scene and I imagined myself if I were a 15-year old nephew of this deceased man, what would I have felt?
Collateral damage is a nice thing to put on a paper but when the collateral damage is your own uncle or cousin, what passions do these arouse? How do you negotiate? How do you tell people whose homes have been destroyed, whose lives have been destroyed, that this does not justify your actions of terrorism. It's hard. Yes, it is true that it does not justify the acts of bombing innocent civilians, that does not solve the problem, but after 50 years of, in many cases, oppression, of US support of authoritarian regimes that have violated human rights in the most heinous of ways, how else do people get attention?
And while Imam Faisal speaks of tolerance and so forth, he commiserates with worst extremists and inciters to genocide:
IMAM FEISAL ABDUL RAUF: The broader community is in fact criticising and condemning actions of terrorism that are being done in the name of Islam. I just came from a conference in Jordan, Amman where there were over 170 leading Muslim scholars from almost every part of the Muslim world, including some of the most important names like Sheikh Tantawi of Egypt, Sheikh Ali Gomaa, who is the Chief Mufti of Egypt, the Chief Mufti of Jordan, the Sheikh Al-Qaradawi, who is a very very well known Islamic jurist, highly regarded all over the Muslim world.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
The Post American Presidecy: Obama's War on USA
Christian Toto over at Human Events has done a review of my book. Here's an excerpt of the review for The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War on America: - Pamela Geller
The media did their best—and still do—to downplay Obama’s radical ties. But this book argues that in probing the President’s anti-Israel bent it doesn’t take much sleuthing to uncover names such as Wright, Bill Ayers, Khalid al-Mansour, Rashid Khalidi and many others of a similar bent. And what about Robert Malley, whom Obama named a key foreign policy advisor? Malley had met with representatives from Hamas and held entrenched anti-Israel views, facts that forced Obama to let him go—temporarily.
Obama’s stance toward Iran, a rogue regime tinkering with its own nuclear program, falls right in line with his inability to use American force—even soft power—in an effective manner. When many Iranian people rose up against the country’s crooked elections, Obama said next to nothing to support them. The mullahs laughed, slaughtered some of the protestors and refueled their nuclear ambitions.
“Iran was clearly emboldened by Barack Obama’s weakness—at the worst possible time for it to be emboldened,” they write. “Obama believed that simply by showing the Iranians some love, he could persuade them to drop their genocidal bellicosity and join the ranks of free nations.”
The President can’t even wage a war for which he long argued was essential to the country’s safety. The President famously dithered for months on a plan to boost U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan and, when he finally came to a decision, it included a withdrawal date, a measure sure to delight Taliban leaders.
Obama often leans on hard, cold fiction to support his international bent. He recast American history to let Islam take a greater part in it while the suppliant media remained silent. When the facts proved without a doubt that the Fort Hood shooter was motivated by radical Islam he couldn’t bring himself to admit that reality.
That Obama weakness matters. Just consider the spate of attempted terrorist attacks against U.S. interests in the late summer and early fall of 2009.
The President’s stance on freedom of speech remains equally shoddy. His followers flooded a Chicago radio station in the run-up to his election to help silence one of his critics, and Obama stood silent while his defenders trotted out the race card to smite any valid criticism of the President or his policies.
The administration’s brief assault on Fox News was simply another part of its strategy to strangle free speech—or any speech that clashes with its post-American worldview.
During the 2008 presidential election season, the Obama team hid a gaggle of his personal records to prevent people from realizing his true nature.
The Post-American Presidency spells out Obama’s radicalism in black and white for all to see—and fear.
The media did their best—and still do—to downplay Obama’s radical ties. But this book argues that in probing the President’s anti-Israel bent it doesn’t take much sleuthing to uncover names such as Wright, Bill Ayers, Khalid al-Mansour, Rashid Khalidi and many others of a similar bent. And what about Robert Malley, whom Obama named a key foreign policy advisor? Malley had met with representatives from Hamas and held entrenched anti-Israel views, facts that forced Obama to let him go—temporarily.
Obama’s stance toward Iran, a rogue regime tinkering with its own nuclear program, falls right in line with his inability to use American force—even soft power—in an effective manner. When many Iranian people rose up against the country’s crooked elections, Obama said next to nothing to support them. The mullahs laughed, slaughtered some of the protestors and refueled their nuclear ambitions.
“Iran was clearly emboldened by Barack Obama’s weakness—at the worst possible time for it to be emboldened,” they write. “Obama believed that simply by showing the Iranians some love, he could persuade them to drop their genocidal bellicosity and join the ranks of free nations.”
The President can’t even wage a war for which he long argued was essential to the country’s safety. The President famously dithered for months on a plan to boost U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan and, when he finally came to a decision, it included a withdrawal date, a measure sure to delight Taliban leaders.
Obama often leans on hard, cold fiction to support his international bent. He recast American history to let Islam take a greater part in it while the suppliant media remained silent. When the facts proved without a doubt that the Fort Hood shooter was motivated by radical Islam he couldn’t bring himself to admit that reality.
That Obama weakness matters. Just consider the spate of attempted terrorist attacks against U.S. interests in the late summer and early fall of 2009.
The President’s stance on freedom of speech remains equally shoddy. His followers flooded a Chicago radio station in the run-up to his election to help silence one of his critics, and Obama stood silent while his defenders trotted out the race card to smite any valid criticism of the President or his policies.
The administration’s brief assault on Fox News was simply another part of its strategy to strangle free speech—or any speech that clashes with its post-American worldview.
During the 2008 presidential election season, the Obama team hid a gaggle of his personal records to prevent people from realizing his true nature.
The Post-American Presidency spells out Obama’s radicalism in black and white for all to see—and fear.
A Tribute to Pamela Geller
Madeleine said...
This is heat? The guy is most likely in his bedroom drooling with his laptop on his lap. All he has done in reality though, is underscore how a gorgeous lady with a lot of talent, brains and moxy can bring this whole national discussion to life, out of the darkness, and into the light, where the evil plans of this Imam and his wife Daisy, are exposed to Americans at large. Pamela didn't need to blog in her bikini, but her life, her thoughts, who she is, where she blogs from, pretty much is an open book to her readers. She has nothing to be ashamed about, nothing to hide, applying make up in her bathroom while talking to her daughter, being a mom, staying up late at night unable to sleep, it's completely believable, and totally relatable, but completely American. What I see is an "American Woman" who juggles being a mother, and all that entails, plus a journalist, and all that entails, plus a daughter, sibling, friend, spokesperson and a down right caring and compassionate human being. This is no small undertaking, her time and her money have been spent on a project to protect the innocent woman of Islam. She has a noble character, something very few people today can even start to relate to. It's no wonder she has my support, with her conservative profile, as hip as she is, as a die hard New Yorker, and lets face it, the likelihood of those two worlds colliding into one chic modern day lady, well it's not typical lets just say that.
Anyone who finds fault with this lady is nothing but a liar, and a pretentious, arrogant, fool! The only people who support this Mosque are those aristocratic, ego centric leaders who have been smudging the beautiful complexion of our nation with their presence in politics and society. They need to go back to where they began in life, and find out where they were when the elementary school teacher was giving the lesson on Patriotism and loyalty to our flag, because they have none. They have nerve being American political figure heads when they sell us out to some Islamic Imam and his wife Daisy Khanartist who have used the doctrine of Taqqia to deceive. Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. Pam, you are a fine example of a multi-tasking momma!
This is heat? The guy is most likely in his bedroom drooling with his laptop on his lap. All he has done in reality though, is underscore how a gorgeous lady with a lot of talent, brains and moxy can bring this whole national discussion to life, out of the darkness, and into the light, where the evil plans of this Imam and his wife Daisy, are exposed to Americans at large. Pamela didn't need to blog in her bikini, but her life, her thoughts, who she is, where she blogs from, pretty much is an open book to her readers. She has nothing to be ashamed about, nothing to hide, applying make up in her bathroom while talking to her daughter, being a mom, staying up late at night unable to sleep, it's completely believable, and totally relatable, but completely American. What I see is an "American Woman" who juggles being a mother, and all that entails, plus a journalist, and all that entails, plus a daughter, sibling, friend, spokesperson and a down right caring and compassionate human being. This is no small undertaking, her time and her money have been spent on a project to protect the innocent woman of Islam. She has a noble character, something very few people today can even start to relate to. It's no wonder she has my support, with her conservative profile, as hip as she is, as a die hard New Yorker, and lets face it, the likelihood of those two worlds colliding into one chic modern day lady, well it's not typical lets just say that.
Anyone who finds fault with this lady is nothing but a liar, and a pretentious, arrogant, fool! The only people who support this Mosque are those aristocratic, ego centric leaders who have been smudging the beautiful complexion of our nation with their presence in politics and society. They need to go back to where they began in life, and find out where they were when the elementary school teacher was giving the lesson on Patriotism and loyalty to our flag, because they have none. They have nerve being American political figure heads when they sell us out to some Islamic Imam and his wife Daisy Khanartist who have used the doctrine of Taqqia to deceive. Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. Pam, you are a fine example of a multi-tasking momma!
Tammy Bruce: Remember in November
Women patriots demonstrating against the GZ Mosque today in New York
I do have a few choice words at the end of this post. Here’s coverage of the protest today at Ground Zero and the pathetic complaints of Obama’s favorite Hillary Clinton Department funded Islamists.
Ground Zero Mosque Opponents, Supporters Turn Out to Demonstrate
Several hundred opponents of the project turned out in drizzling rain, chanting, “No mosque at Ground Zero.”
They carried signs saying, “You Can Build Your Mosque at Ground Zero When We Can Build Our Synagogue at Mecca,” and “Building a Mosque at Ground Zero Is Like Building a Memorial to Hitler at Auschwitz.”
“We don’t care what bigots say, religious freedom’s here to stay,” the community center’s supporters responded…
Daisy Khan, who, with her husband, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, is leading the project, said today on ABC News’ “This Week,” that she fears the rising wave of opposition to the community center is an indication that Americans’ anger against Muslims is deepening.
“We are deeply concerned because this is like a metastasized antisemitism,” she said. “That’s what we feel right now. It’s not even Islamophobia, it’s beyond Islamophobia. It’s hate of Muslims.”
What Daisy Khan doesn’t seem to understand is that perhaps this isn’t about Muslims at all, but about Americans protecting and defending a site that is now precious to us. The malignant Narcissism of these people is astounding and so encompassing they, like the Obama admin in fact, cannot see beyond their own self-obsession. Little Daisy is loathsome–we didn’t start this, they did. We didn’t choose the location, they did. And the gall to claim opposition to the GZ mosque is “metastasized antisemitism” is the same as our own government calling Tea Party Patriots Nazis, UnAmerican, and the Mob. They’re all the same. There’s only one group of people who were mass murdered on 911 and that was Americans, not Muslims. And there has been only one group continuing to implement mass murder since then–Muslims. And there is one country that still calls for the mass extinction of Jews in the world, and it’s a Muslim country.
As Khan and her gang point fingers at Americans, another little reminder–since 9/11 we didn’t set out to annihilate Muslims around the world–we set out to free them. Thousands more Americans have died voluntarily serving in our military knowing they would be sent to the front line and whom ultimately liberated 53 million Muslims. And this detestable woman and her parasitic husband call us names as they decry that we haven’t gotten over 9/11 yet.
I’m convinced this mosque was Obama’s idea. The notion of it and its location. I think he knows he’ll be a one-term president and wants as much destruction to the American psyche as possible. The legacy this man is now establishing is a continuation of the terrorism unleashed in the 90s and defined by 9/11.
So do not blink, keep the pressure on the stop this atrocity at Ground Zero and…Remember in November.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
