US Media Doesn't Show the Counter-Islam Debate

Why won't the media do its job? Investigate ISNA. Instead they accept, at face value, the CAIR representative's completely dishonest answer to this question:

CNBC: "Is there anything to the allegation that the organization has terrorist links?'

CAIR: "There is absolutely no truth to that. This really isn't about the organization certifying it. It's about the conservative blogger who is against this trying to find any excuse to stop anything Muslim in this country."

The anchor accepts that claim coming from another Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas-linked front. You can't make this stuff up. Did anyone look at the evidence that resulted in a 108-count indictment?

Hamas-linked CAIR rep continues:

This is a manufactured controversy. In this case Pamela Geller and her group are just taking this as an excuse, even a dietary accommodation they find to be threatening, they are trying to whip up fear about Muslim sin this country.

It gets worse. "Fear about being picked on or called a name......" How about fear of jihad, moron?

The completely uninformed anchor described the boycott as bigotry. This kind of feckless smear reporting should be drummed off the air. ISNA is a Muslim Brotherhood front (click the links at the bottom of this post). Why is the media carrying water for the most radical, intolerant ideology in the world?

Asking for a Dictator

Mr Bush has costructed an excellent foundation for a dictatorship. A less benign President than Obama could turn the thumbscrews on the population. His controlled media would convince ordinary citizens of his good will. Who would notice the FEMA concentration camps bulging with malcontents? Who would care if Iran, North Korea or Pakistan became water vapor? Who would object to turning in dollars for Ameros? Who would report Guantanamo Bay filling up with Congressmen, stock brokers, bankers, CEO's, civil servants and bureaucrats?

Media Military Analysts & the Bush Administration

NY Times quoted on Daily Kos

To the public, these men are members of a familiar fraternity, presented tens of thousands of times on television and radio as "military analysts" whose long service has equipped them to give authoritative and unfettered judgments about the most pressing issues of the post-Sept. 11 world.

Hidden behind that appearance of objectivity, though, is a Pentagon information apparatus that has used those analysts in a campaign to generate favorable news coverage of the administration’s wartime performance, an examination by The New York Times has found.

The effort, which began with the buildup to the Iraq war and continues to this day, has sought to exploit ideological and military allegiances, and also a powerful financial dynamic: Most of the analysts have ties to military contractors vested in the very war policies they are asked to assess on air.

What is So Liberal about the Mass Media?

The US mass media ignores the State Department theft of nuclear secrets, the violent deaths of over one million Iraqis, the lack of US government oversight, the detention and torture of victims grabbed illegally by the CIA, the unconstitutionality of NSPD 51, the threat of martial law etc.
What 'liberal' bias do you detect?
Maybe you call them biased for not urging the lynching of Michelle Obama and the assassination of her husband.