Bush Approves
HuffPost
Note: This ‘Okay’ is an American propaganda ploy. It would get the Republicans off the hook with Israelis replacing them.
We have no need to wage a preemptive war. It is illegal, immoral and considered murder by our religious sages. Serving long years in hell to ease the neocon burden and to fill up SUV’s is not a Jewish ambition.
Last month Seymour Hersh of the New Yorker reported that the Bush Administration has stepped up covert operations inside
President George W Bush has told the Israeli government that he may be prepared to approve a future military strike on Iranian nuclear facilities if negotiations with
Despite the opposition of his own generals and widespread scepticism that
"Amber means get on with your preparations, stand by for immediate attack and tell us when you're ready," the official said. But the Israelis have also been told that they can expect no help from American forces and will not be able to use
Nor is it certain that Bush's amber light would ever turn to green without irrefutable evidence of lethal Iranian hostility.
"It's really all down to the Israelis," the Pentagon official added. "This administration will not attack
1 comment:
I wish that Bush would agree to meet with Ahmadinejad. Sadly, however, it's doubtful that Bush will seriously give negotiations a chance.
Experts have been predicting that Bush would authorize a strike on Iran for years:
“I believe President Bush is going to order air strikes (on Iran) before he leaves office”
-Norman Podhoretz (Lyons, 2007).
Bush and his cronies say they want peace and diplomacy, but the problem with the members of Bush administration is that you can't trust them. You can't take what they at face value.
The administration secretly planned and prepared for war with Iraq without disclosing it to the general public.
Yet, when asked about Iraq, Bush’s favorite response was “I have no war plans on my desk.” At one point or another after the planning began, nearly every member of the administration publicly denied any plans to go to war with Iraq.
The question remains: Why would we expect the Bush administration to start being honest and up front about its intentions now?
A better approach to Iran would be negotiations. We need to give Iran an honorable path of retreat. While Fareed Zakaria agrees that there is no reason not to use sanctions and embargoes against states such as Iran, he suggests that we also need to “allow a viable way out.” That is to say, we need to negotiate and not merely mandate.
I think we should more concerned about acquainting ourselves with the realities of Iran's foreign policy initiatives, and intelligently determining our most reasonable course of action.
Post a Comment