Star of David Denigrated by Ground Zero Mosque Design

Granted that the hexagram (six-pointed star) has been anciently used to decorate churches, mosques and Hindu temples long before it was adopted by the Jewish people as a symbol of their identity, Zionism and the State of Israel the fact is that using it so blatently in the atrocious "futuristic" design of the controversial supremacist mosque is in very poor taste and adds to its extreme offensiveness and insensitivity. Given the fact of Imam Rauf's support for Hamas, Hezbollah and the Islamo-Nazi regime of Iran; given his denial of Israel's right to exist as a Jewish state, and that he wants it destroyed with its Jewish population living as an oppressed and powerless minority in a larger Arab state (which he predicts will happen in his lifetime); given all this compounds the mosque's image as a hostile, subversive anti-Western enterprise whose ugly design reflects its evil nature.

LEFTISBEST who agrees with Hazzi and simply repeats what he says about the universality of hexagrams "dares" me or anyone to "point at Park51 and say that it's a Moslem mosque." I dare say that it's currently being used as a mosque offering Moslem prayer services to believers. And that if the monstrosity is ever built it will continue to function as a mosque with the addition of a cultural center for cultivating stealth jihadists.

As for Lucinder's mystical interpretation of the hexagram as signifying what Hindu's call the "heart chakra" and that it symbolizes Rauf's "Sufi compassion" I have this to say: the real Rauf is a fundamentalist with a radical Moslem heart focused on the triumph of Sharia Islam over America, the West and the world. In fact, Rauf is an Islamic supremacist with no more heart for interfaith dialogue and liberal reform than Osama bin Ladin. But unlike bin Ladin he plays the New Age, ecumenical, multicultural game of religious unity and one worldism with the Left, while believing that Islam is God's answer to unifying humanity in peace.



Now as for Lucinder's enthusiam for Deepak Chopra's fictional account of the prophet Mohammed's life why would I want to read a book that humanizes him? What is it about the historical Mohammed that he needs Chopra to humanize him? Answer: he was an unconscionable, merciless inhuman killing machine for Islam twisted by his lust for power, wealth and women. Chopra can humanize and idealize and, like his friend Karen Armstrong, sanitize Mohammed all he wants but it can't change the horrible truth about his life of injustice and crime for gain and immortal glory. It can't change the truth about the terribly destructive forces he unleashed on the world that's still with us today. The reform of Islam needs more than a fictionalized account of Mohammed's life; it needs the complete rejection and denunciation of his injustices, atrocities and crimes.

By ApolloSpeaks