Thursday, December 2, 2010

Oklahoma Mom Reminds Judge of Shar'ia Evils

I thought Atlas readers should see this letter sent to the dhimmi judge who struck down the anti-sharia (Islamic law) amendment that was overwhelmingly approved by 70% of the people of Oklahoma:

November 2010

[Judge] Vicki Miles-LaGrange

200 NW 4th Street

Oklahoma City, OK 73102

Vicki;

I was raped by my Jordanian-born Muslim Arab [husband] while married. He had no conscience or guilt regarding this as it is customary under his religious beliefs to treat his wife as such. I spent eleven years being "tolerant" until I decided that staying alive was an important issue. I suffered double discrimination: I was not only female but American. At that time the court system could not protect me from an evil they knew not existed. I had hoped this legislation would protect other young women from enduring the same. You have effectively given him and many others a green light to perform such inhumane behaviors and also spit in my face in light of my twenty years of hell involving the Islamic community in Tulsa, Oklahoma. They taught my own children well: My daughter rejected me when she was eleven because I was an infidel. I did not deserve this disrespect because of my actions. She behaved in such a manner because she was taught this via the Islamic Society of Tulsa about non-Muslims. Not only did you ban this legislation, but you have weakened the constitution designed to protect us from outside inhuman laws one might use under the guise of "freedom of religious expression". Really, it is common sense to understand that laws outside of the United States would only weaken the liberty of U.S. citizens.

You have ruled in favor of a corrupt minority (CAIR) and ruled against the wisdom of the majority of Oklahoma voters. You have effectively caused me to stop voting as I believe my vote no longer matters. From this point on you are responsible for the atrocities committed under the ideology of the Islamic community (Ummah) in Oklahoma and are subject to remain responsible for the continual sedition practiced by the greater corrupt Ummah (Society of Muslims). Highly conservative states such as Oklahoma are a priority of attack from the Muslim brotherhood and other terrorist ideologically based Islamic communities. Their goal is to weaken conservative stances in order to implement their ideology via the community while constantly creating frivolous lawsuits undermining the public's opinion regarding Islam. It's called SEDITION. You just helped them. Islam is what Islam does and no amount of law suits can change that reality. No amount of judges can protect something or someone of the consequences of their bad actions. And no amount of "tolerance" can keep you from becoming responsible for what happens to young women in Oklahoma when they are abused and there is no court to protect them from Islamic "freedom of religious expression."


Of course, my opinion does not matter because I am just a worthless serf who has no clue what's good for me according to people like you. For your information I am an ex Muslim and my two oldest children are Muslim. Once my daughter became an “adult” according to her belief system, she could effectively have a relationship with me, the infidel. We do, indeed, have a great relationship. But according to Islam once a woman divorces her husband and the children reach a certain age she has no rights to them and Muslims can and will ignore the laws of the United States to ensure that rule is followed. My daughter understands how much I hate Islam. I am not prejudiced. I realize the greatest of this country is based upon the sound principles contained within the constitution verses those of other ideologies. Apparently you do not. Even my American-born Muslim daughter is smart enough to understand why this legislation was put into place. She would prefer to have protection from domestic violence rampant amongst Muslim men. She remembers the abuse I suffered at the hand of her father. You just gave her husband a green light to abuse her under "freedom of religious expression". What's wrong with you? Oh, you're a judge who "knows better". Yeah.

Do not bother responding or replying. If you are inclined to even hear this message, keep it within your heart and compare it to the events that follow through the years. I do wish you well. I also wish your descendants well - especially those who will convert to Islam from sheer peer pressure, revisionist history and bias encourage by a liberal-based government who "knows what's best for the people".

Your principles suck, Vicki.

Sincerely,

B

No comments: