data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43a72/43a720e62a432daf31fb5696c0a0995f7dd8b309" alt=""
You will recall that 'Human Rights Watch' was conflicted on Monday about how to respond to the killing of Osama Bin Laden. Now, they've had a chance to think about it. And they've decided to condemn Bin Laden's killing. Really.
On May 3 HRW executive director Ken Roth tweeted: Ban Ki-moon wrong on #Osama bin Laden: It’s not “justice” for him to be killed even if justified; no trial, conviction http://reut.rs/kKQfuu
In contrast to elected officials, such as President Obama, who must choose between real options, Roth presents a fictitious alternative in which arch-terrorists in countries like Pakistan can be arrested, tried, and punished by functioning international judicial systems.
Of course.
Labels: Human Rights Watch, Osama Bin Laden
posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 10:11 PM
No comments:
Post a Comment