
Watch "Arizona Governor To Illegals With U.S Children: Take Them Back Home With You" Video at mediaite
This is a war against families especially children.
If you can't put the opponent on death row, you should shut your mouth.
Unable to find a useful charge from the Bill of Rights, I consult the UN 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Working with 30 Articles, I can find something to charge the culprit with crimes against humanity.
A rightwingnut can't take a breath without violating one Article or another. If he has actuated his words with deeds, he is dead meat. Anyone who is really interested in prosecuting public officials can do this in his spare time like a hobby.
In
The Supreme Court told me to go home and rewrite my suit. Then, they wrote a behind my back decision to pay $2000 in court costs. There are actions pending in the European courts accusing many Israeli judges of crimes against humanity. Maybe, we can get them for failure to appear.
A US Embassy official mocked me. "Do you want us to send the Marines?"
"Hey! That's a great idea." I said.
Punishment not Rhetoric
Concerned Americans could combine to form class action lawsuits in
If the
Glenn Greenwald, Salon.com
Most certainly, the press will pretend to be above it all ("this is not something that we, the sophisticated political journalists, care about, of course"). But they yammer about Drudge-promoted gossip endlessly, and then insist that their own chattering is proof that it is an important story that people care about. And because they conclude that "people" (i.e., them) are concerned with the story, they keep chirping about it, which in turn fuels their belief that the story is important. It is an endless loop of self-referential narcissism -- whatever they endlessly sputter is what "the people" care about, and therefore they must keep harping on it, because their chatter is proof of its importance.
They don't need Drudge to rule their world any longer because they are Matt Drudge now.
Every day, it becomes more difficult to blame George Bush, Dick Cheney and comrades for their seven years (and counting) of crimes, corruption and destruction of our political values. Think about it this way: if you were a high government official and watched as -- all in a couple of weeks time -- it is revealed, right out in the open, that you suspended the Fourth Amendment, authorized torture, proclaimed yourself empowered to break the law, and sent the nation's top law enforcement officer to lie blatantly about how and why the 9/11 attacks happened so that you could acquire still more unchecked spying power and get rid of lawsuits that would expose what you did, and the political press in this country basically ignored all of that and blathered on about Obama's bowling score and how he eats chocolate, wouldn't you also conclude that you could do anything you want, without limits, and know there will be no consequences? What would be the incentive to stop doing all of that?