Showing posts with label Hezbollah. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hezbollah. Show all posts

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Will Millions Palestinians Invade Israel on May 15th?


The Turkish Islamist press claims that 'millions' of 'Palestinians' are going to walk toward Israel on May 15.

The radical Islamist Turkish daily Yeni Akit (formerly Vakit) had the headline “It’s Israel’s Turn to Panic” in yesterday’s issue. It wrote that millions of Palestinians were about to march into Israel from Lebanon.

Columnist Ibrahim Karagul of the Islamist Yeni Safak, known to be the semi-official mouthpiece of AKP, also wrote about the pending march under the title “Hizbollah Marches to Israel!”

Karagul wrote that a big plan was in the works in Lebanon, that would impact the entire region. He wrote that on May 15, the anniversary of Naqba, Hizbollah and its affiliated organizations would take the Palestinians along and walk towards the Palestinian lands occupied by Israel.

“It is easy to predict how Israel will react to a huge crowd of people approaching under the umbrella of the (Palestinian) 'Return Movement'. This march from Lebanon to the occupied territories may spark a new war in the region” Karagul wrote. He attributed the plan to Iran and Hizbollah’s struggle to hold and keep the ‘Palestinian card’ in their hands, in face of new developments in the region - especially in Syria - that may lead to their losing of Hamas to the influence of the Sunni camp.

Yes, indeed, it might spark a new war. But if it does, you can bet that it will be the 'Palestinians' that start it and Israel that finishes it.

What could go wrong?

Labels: Hezbullah, Iran, Lebanon, naqba, Palestinian

posted by Carl in Jerusalem

Saturday, April 30, 2011

Hezbollah and Syria Debate Who Firsr to Hit Tel-Aviv


'In case' of war, Syria and Hezbullah have announced that they will compete to see who can hit Tel Aviv first.

If war breaks out between Israel, Syria, and Hezbollah, Syrian President Bashar Assad's regime will "play powerful cards" in south Lebanon and will not hesitate to respond, senior security officials in Syria said, according to the Kuwaiti newspaper Al Rai.

According to the officials, in case of war with Israel, Syria and Hezbollah will compete with each other over who will fire the first Scud or Fateh missile at Tel Aviv.

The Syrian officials also warned that the deteriorating security situation in Syria and damage to the country's stability may also have an effect on the situation in Iraq, Jordan, and Lebanon.

I think that the IDF should let its pilots compete over whether Beirut or Damascus will be turned to rubble first. Heh.

Labels: Fateh 110, Hezbullah, scud missiles, Syria

posted by Carl in Jerusalem

Friday, April 22, 2011

Hezbollah Calls UN Chief a Zionist

[U.N. chief Ban Ki-moon]on Wednesday called on Syria to help Lebanon in transforming Hizbullah from an "armed militia" into a political party.

"The existence and activities of Lebanese and non-Lebanese militias continue to pose a threat to the stability of the country and the region," read Ban's report on the implementation of Security Council Resolution 1559, which was adopted in 2004 and calls for "the disbanding and disarmament" of all factions in Lebanon.

Hizbullah on Thursday hit back at Ban.

"It is not something new for the U.N. secretary general to take unjust and unfair stances in his analysis of the situation in Lebanon, especially in terms of holding Hizbullah responsible for all the problems in Lebanon," the party said in a communiqué.

"This is the nature of the mission assigned to him by the U.S. administration and some Western governments, which he is carrying out very precisely instead of performing his role … in achieving security and peace in the world."

"The U.N. secretary general's latest stance clearly shows that he is blatantly on the side of the Zionists who are violating Lebanon's security and stability," said Hizbullah in its communiqué.

The party accused Ban of justifying Israel's "crimes and terrorist practices while condemning Lebanon's preservation of its strength and immunity in the face of this blatant aggression."

It also said Ban "relied on reports written by Terje Roed-Larsen," U.N. Secretary-General's envoy on the implementation of Security Council Resolution 1559.

Hizbullah described Larsen as "the U.N. official in service of the Zionist media structure."

It accused Ban of animosity against "the Resistance, Lebanon, Arabs and all the just causes in the world," vowing to continue to "protect Lebanon and preserve its dignity according to the golden army-people-Resistance formula."

Earlier Thursday, Hizbullah MP Hussein al-Moussawi also lashed out at Ban over his report.

Moussawi said he was not "surprised by Ban Ki-moon's statements, because the latter is part of the American-Zionist alliance which has always targeted mujahid peoples.

"Enough of your submission to the American tyrant and the Zionist criminal."

The UN, of course, loves this sort of thing, because then it can claim this as proof it is even-handed. "See? we are accused of being Zionist and anti-Zionist! This shows we are right!"

Thursday, April 7, 2011

The Useless Arab Spring


Michael Totten reports that the so-called 'Arab spring' has done very little thus far to change the most vehement enemies of the US and Israel.

At least NATO is busy patrolling the skies over Libya. But the Arab League pretends there's nothing to see in Damascus as Assad warns darkly of Jewish plots, guns down demonstrators with live ammunition and takes organizers from their homes in the night, throwing them into dungeons.

And the Iranian regime looks as strong as ever. Millions of demonstrators have been trying to bring down the government for almost two years now, but they appear no more likely to prevail today than they did when they started. If Green Movement leaders don't take up arms as Libya's rebels have, and if the Revolutionary Guard remains loyal to President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Supreme Guide Ali Khamenei, Iran may well be immune from internally-driven regime-change for now.

It's remotely possible that the Gaza Strip Palestinians will temporarily forget about Israel and remove the Hamas entity that so cruelly governs them, but there's no chance at all that nonviolent protests or even an armed rebellion will eject Hezbollah from Lebanon.

Hezbollah isn't the government, it's a terrorist army, and it controls Lebanon from the shadows, where demonstrations can't reach it. Lebanon has produced more mass demonstrations than any Arab country by far, and has been producing them since 2005. But guerrillas in hardened bunkers who can't wait to go to heaven after impaling themselves on the Zionist Entity don't care two figs what protesters in Beirut, or even ostensible government ministers, have to say.

Syria and Iran arm and equip Hezbollah, and Hezbollah controls the Lebanese-Israeli border, so that border has effectively become the frontline not only in the Arab-Israeli conflict, but also the Iranian-Israeli conflict and the conflict between the West and Iran in general.

Hezbollah has more rockets and missiles -- as well as more powerful ones -- than it did during the devastating 2006 war with Israel. Indeed, it has more rockets and missiles than most legitimate national militaries. It's a real, bona-fide terrorist army -- armed not with boxcutters and improvised-explosive devices but with the heavy weaponry possessed otherwise only by states.

Yet it retains all the advantages of a nonstate guerrilla army, making it exceptionally difficult to defeat even with conventional forces, let alone street demonstrations.

NATO's low-grade intervention in Libya is dominating the headlines, but in hindsight it may look like a sideshow. If the Iranian ayatollahs develop nuclear weapons -- and it seems like being overthrown is the only thing that will actually stop them -- not only will their Syrian sidekicks enjoy a protective nuclear umbrella, so will their terrorist proxies in Gaza and Lebanon.

What could go wrong?

Labels: Arab spring, Hamas, Hezbullah, Iran, Syria

posted by Carl in Jerusalem

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

Hezbollah has Enough Votes to Elect New PM

Hezbullah has lined up enough votes in the Lebanese parliament to name that country's next Prime Minister. They plan to name billionaire businessman Najib Mikati, a 'moderate' politician and former premier. Hezbullah's opponents in the March 14 movement rioted in Tripoli in response.

Several hundred Hariri supporters in the northern city of Tripoli, a predominantly Sunni area and a hotbed of fundamentalists, staged protests Monday chanting slogans against Mikati, a lawmaker from Tripoli.

The protesters waved pictures of Hariri and shouted: "Mikati you are not one of us, leave Tripoli and go away." Some banners read: "The blood of Sunnis is boiling."

The protesters briefly closed a main road in the town of Minyeh in Tripoli.

Mikati appealed for calm and, in a statement, called on Hariri supporters not to upset stability.

Hizbullah and its allies had the support of at least 57 seats and gained seven more from the bloc of Walid Jumblatt, the influential leader of the Druse sect. With Mikati's vote, Hizbullah reached 65. The voting in parliament on a new candidate for prime minister was to continue on Tuesday.

Hizbullah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah said Sunday if their candidate gets the post of prime minister, the group will try to form another national unity government with Hariri's Western-backed bloc.

But Hariri said Monday he will not join a government headed by a Hizbullah-backed candidate.

On Sunday, Hizbullah's bloc chose Mikati, who served briefly as premier in 2005. He presented himself as a candidate reaching out to all sides.

"I don't distinguish between anyone. I extend my hand to everyone without exception. ... I say to Prime Minister Saad Hariri, let us all work together for the sake of Lebanon," he told reporters.

But Mikati dodged a question if he would end Lebanon's cooperation with the international court — a key Hizbullah demand — saying only that "any dispute can be solved only through dialogue."

A statement issued by Hariri's office said there is no "consensual candidate" and made clear Hariri remained the Western-backed camp's choice for prime minister.

Lawmaker Oqab Sakr said Mikati's candidacy was "a clear challenge to the will of the parliamentary and popular majority."

A Harvard graduate, Mikati is seen as a relatively neutral figure who enjoys good relations with Syrian President Bashar Assad and with the pro-Western Hariri, who himself is seeking to keep the post.

Mikati, whose wealth is estimated at $2.5 billion is on the Forbes list of world billionaires. In the 1980s, during Lebanon's civil war, he founded telecom company Investcom with his elder brother, Taha. They sold the company to South Africa's MTN Group for $5.5 billion in 2006.

The Mikati brothers now run M1 Group, a multibillion dollar holding company with interests in telecom, oil and gas and real estate among other things.

Last year, M1 bought a 13.95 percent stake in Bank Audi, Lebanon largest bank, for $450 million.

Israel radio has just reported that the United States says it would 'find it difficult' to support Lebanon if Hezbullah plays any key role in the government.

What could go wrong?

Labels: Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbullah, Lebanon, Najib Mikati, Saad Hariri

posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 10:46 PM


Name: Carl in Jerusalem
Location: Jerusalem, Israel

Saturday, January 15, 2011

Nasrallah Promises to Kill Anybody Who Gets in His Way

Hezbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah gave one of his lengthy, televised speeches on Thursday night, and promised that there would be no civil war in Lebanon.

The Hezbollah leader said he was sure there would be no civil conflict between Shiites and Sunnis in Lebanon.

But why would there be no civil conflict?

Nasrallah blamed Hariri for the current political crisis.

Hariri met with U.S. President Barack Obama in Washington on Wednesday and held talks in France and Turkey on Thursday.

Nasrallah called on Hariri to stay abroad and not return to Lebanon.

JPost adds:

Hizbullah told Suleiman that it will not allow Hariri to continue as prime minister, according to a Thursday report by Lebanese paper Al-Akhbar.

"He is not fit to have this responsibility, as experience has proven," a Hizbullah source told Al-Akhbar.

Another Hizbullah source told Lebanese daily A-Safir that Hariri will not be prime minister anymore "because he is part of the problem, not the solution."

The message is that there won't be a civil war in Lebanon so long as Saad Hariri is not the Prime Minister.

What could go wrong?

Labels: Hassan Nasrallah, Lebanon, Saad Hariri, Special Tribunal for Lebanon

posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 1:55 PM

You might like:

* Hariri tribunal: Nasrallah's a liar (this site)
* Is a Passport Required to Enter Canada From the United States? (eHow)
* Im Tirtzu: Arab money supporting Israeli Leftist groups :: Israel Matzav (this site)
* Disgusting: 'Israeli Arabs' celebrating massive fire in Haifa (this site)

(Selected for you by our sponsor )

0 Comments:

Post a Comment
Links to this post:

Backlinks - Sultan Knish a blog by Daniel Greenfield
This was what the political climate looked like back in 2006 when this was the DVD cover of a widely promoted movie featuring the murder of President Bush, as a way of discussing how awful Bush is. This wasn't the work of a single ...
posted by Daniel Greenfield @ the Sultan Knish blog @ 10:43 PM

Create a Link

<< Home

About Me

Name: Carl in Jerusalem
Location: Jerusalem, Israel

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Government Collapse in Lebanon

Lebanon's government collapsed Wednesday after Hezbollah and its allies resigned from the Cabinet in a dispute with Western-backed factions over upcoming indictments in the 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri.
A U.N.-backed tribunal investigating the truck bombing that killed Hariri and 22 others is widely expected to name members of the Shiite militant group, which many fear could re-ignite sectarian violence that has erupted repeatedly in the tiny nation.
Hezbollah's walkout ushers in the country's worst political crisis since 2008 in one of the most volatile corners of the Middle East.
Lebanon's 14-month-old government was an uneasy coalition linking bitter rivals: a Western-backed bloc led by Hariri's son Saad and Hezbollah, which is supported by Syria and Iran and maintains an arsenal that far outweighs that of the national army.
Disputes over the tribunal have paralyzed the government for months, with Hezbollah denouncing the court as a conspiracy by the U.S. and Israel and urging the prime minister to reject any of its findings. But Hariri has refused to break cooperation with the Netherlands-based tribunal.
Now, the chasm between the two sides is deepening with Hezbollah accusing Hariri's bloc of bowing to the West. Hezbollah's ministers timed their resignations to coincide with Hariri's meeting with President Barack Obama in Washington, forcing him to meet the American president as a caretaker prime minister.
Western governments have worked to strengthen the central government since Israel and Hezbollah fought a devastating 34-day war in 2006, but they also have expressed concern about the balance of power with the heavily armed militant group.
The U.S. classifies Hezbollah as a terrorist organization.
A White House statement said Obama commended Hariri for his "steadfast leadership and efforts to reach peace, stability and consensus in Lebanon under difficult circumstances."
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Hezbollah's actions are "a transparent effort ... to subvert justice and to undermine Lebanon's sovereignty and independence."
"No country should be forced to choose between justice and stability," Clinton said while traveling in Doha, Qatar. "The Lebanese people deserve both."
Hariri's office had no immediate comment on the walkout that brought down his government, but they said he was heading to France to meet French President Sarkozy before heading back to Beirut. France, Lebanon's former colonial power, is a major player in Lebanese politics.
The immediate trigger for the Hezbollah withdrawal was the failure of talks between Syria and Saudi Arabia, a Hariri ally, to try to find a compromise over the tribunal.
There had been few details about the direction of the Syrian-Saudi initiative, but the talks were lauded as a potential Arab breakthrough, rather than a solution offered by Western powers.
"This Cabinet has become a burden on the Lebanese, unable to do its work," Jibran Bassil, who is resigning his post as energy minister, said at a news conference, flanked by the other Hezbollah-allied ministers who are stepping down. "We are giving a chance for another government to take over."
Bassil said the ministers decided to resign after Hariri "succumbed to foreign and American pressures" and turned his back on the Syrian-Saudi efforts.
Calls to the tribunal seeking comment Wednesday were not immediately returned.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon "is monitoring closely developments in Lebanon, where the situation is fast evolving," U.N. spokesman Martin Nesirky said.
Hariri formed the current national unity government in November 2009 after his bloc narrowly defeated the Hezbollah-led opposition in elections. But it has struggled to function, and in the past two months it has met only for a few minutes because of the dispute over the tribunal.
[...]


Rafik Hariri's assassination in a massive truck bombings both stunned and polarized Lebanese. He was Lebanon's most prominent politician in the years after Lebanon's 1975-1990 civil war -- a Sunni who was a hero to his own community and backed by many Christians who sympathized with his efforts in the last few months of his life to reduce Syrian influence in the country.
A string of assassinations of anti-Syrian politicians and public figures followed, which U.N. investigators have said may have been connected to the Hariri killing.


The tribunal has not said who it will indict, but Hezbollah leader Sheik Hassan Nasrallah has said he has information that members of his group will be named.
Now that the government has fallen, President Michel Suleiman will likely hold a meeting with the parliament speaker marking the beginning of consultations with lawmakers to name a prime minister-designate.
It is possible that Saad Hariri will get the largest numbers of backers given that he heads the largest bloc in parliament, but he could not build a coalition again without appealing to Hezbollah and its allies.

Sunday, January 2, 2011

Fighting the Information War - Caroline Glick

Caroline Glick argues that Israel needs to do a more effective job of fighting the information war.

WHAT ALL of this shows is that information wars are not just about getting out the facts. Like kinetic warfare, they involve power plays, intimidation and the use of subconscious and visceral manipulation.

Israel has recently awoken to one aspect of information warfare. It has recognized the consequences of years of demonization of Israel in Europe and international organizations. But Israel has yet to awaken to the fact that it is a type of warfare and has to be countered with counter-information warfare.

Obviously this doesn't mean that Israel should begin acting like its enemies. But what it does mean is that Israel must begin using more hard-knuckle techniques to defend itself. It must begin targeting people's emotions as well has their minds.

For instance, when Israel is confronted by threats of lawsuits for acts of self-defense, it responds with defense attorneys. When the US was threatened with lawfare by Belgian courts, then secretary of defense Donald Rumsfeld responded by threatening to remove NATO headquarters from Belgium.

When Israel is accused of targeting Palestinian civilians, it responds by attaching legal advisors to combat units. What it should be doing instead is providing film footage of Palestinian children being trained as terrorists and exploited as human shields.

War is a dirty business. Information warfare is a dirty form of war. And if we don't want to lose, we'd better start fighting.

Read the whole thing. You'll also find out why I put a picture of Koby Mandell HY"D (may God avenge his blood) at the top of this post.

Labels: Caroline Glick, Hezbullah, information war, Koby Mandell, Palestinian Authority

posted by Carl in Jerusalem

Sunday, September 19, 2010

Good News: Hezbollah Preparing for War


Hezbullah has sent a group that looks a bit more fearsome than these guys (from the 2006 Second Lebanon War) to train on Fateh 110 rockets in Iran.

Hizbullah has conducted missile maneuvers on Fateh 110 rockets in Iran, reported the Kuwaiti al-Rai newspaper on Saturday.

Sources concerned told the paper that the units participating in the maneuvers have returned to Lebanon after demonstrating great prowess in using this long-range missile.

The newspaper also highlighted the fact that the party's maneuvers coincided with Israeli military maneuvers, which it interpreted as a growing readiness by both sides to wage a new war that is expected to be "the last of the wars" due to its expected highly destructive nature.

More on the Fateh 110 here. You may recall that in the last war, Israel wiped out Hezbullah's long-range missile capability on the ground. Heh.

posted by Carl in Jerusalem @ 1:12 AM

Thursday, September 16, 2010

Hezbollah has Drones and Missiles with 300 km Range

In addition to the laundry list at left, IDF intelligence has confirmed that Hezbullah has drones and that it has missiles with a 300 km. range.

Thousands of missiles. Head of the Counter-Terrorism Bureau in Israel, Brigadier-General Nitzan Nuriel, said Hizbullah owns drones and long-range missiles.

"Hizbullah has weapons that are not found in Europe," Nuriel said during a lecture at the annual conference of counter-terrorism in Herzliya, a city located on the central coast of Israel.

"Hizbullah has unmanned drones and missiles with a range of more than 300 km and so is the case of Hamas in Gaza," Nuriel added.

Well, let's hear it for the moron with the lousy English who brought us UN Security Council Resolution 1701, which allowed Hezbullah to re-arm under the watchful eye of UNIFIL.

posted by Carl in Jerusalem

Monday, September 6, 2010

SARRAZIN ´s Problem Al Quds Muslimin schreit Scheiss Juden Berlin



As Jonathan Hoffman noted:

The Al Quds Day march is the biggest annual Israel hatefest in London. It is nothing more than a march of Ahmadinejad supporters, a front for the Mullahs. Today there were many Hezbollah and Hamas flags, slightly altered to prevent their owners being arrested for offences against the Terrorist Acts….This hateful march should never have been allowed to take place. “We Are All Hizbolla Now” and “Zionism Equals Racism” were just two of the racist chants.

Here’s one of the videos from the event:

UPDATE: More video from Germany here, Muslims screaming "shit Jews." hat tip Armaros

Friday, August 13, 2010

Hezbollah Hates Israelis....and Palestinians too


Nasrullah and Mershaal
Mudar Zahran points out the hypocrisy of Hezbullah leader Hassan Nasrallah, who champions the 'Palestinian' cause - but only when it hurts Israel.

WHILE MANY, including some Israelis, seem to believe that Nasrallah loves the Palestinians, and would fight for their cause, the facts on the ground reflect a totally different reality. Hizbullah represents the Shi’ites in Lebanon, who describe themselves as an extension of the global Shi’ite body, with strong emotional and ideological ties to Iran. The Shi’ites in Lebanon have always felt threatened by the Palestinians, who are strictly Sunnis, and whose presence in Lebanon is viewed as adding demographic heavy weight to Lebanese Sunnis. While Lebanese Shi’ite figures never mention this fact, they have been vigorously working against it in practice; they even took up arms against the Palestinians during the Lebanese civil war. In fact, Lebanese Shi’ite were responsible for some of the most notorious atrocities against the Palestinians, with welldocumented massacres and the siege of the Palestinian refugee camps. Ironically, when they ended these in 1987, Shi’ite leader Nabih Berri told the press that this was “a gift for the Intifada.”

Hundreds of the war criminals that were involved in those massacres are now affiliated with Hizbullah, some in senior positions.

The group has been ruthless in its efforts to marginalize and control the Sunni Palestinian population in Lebanon; its leaders insisted on confining 400,000 Palestinians to the refugee camps as a condition for ending the civil war in 1989.

Before his latest press conference, Nasrallah was promoting that his faction would “punish” Israel if it obstructed a Lebanese aid flotilla headed for Gaza. This comes as one of an endless series of media stunts in which Nasrallah portrays himself and Hizbullah as the defenders of the Palestinian cause.

While Nasrallah claims he wants to see food items and medications delivered to Gaza, Palestinians in Lebanon are literally locked up inside their camps every evening. Banned from working legally, Palestinians in Lebanon have to depend on international aid and donations, which Lebanon monitors and restricts. This has resulted in intolerable living conditions. The post- Syrian Lebanese governments exhibited a tendency to improve the living conditions for the Palestinians on its soil; nonetheless, Hizbullah has been most fierce in fighting that trend. Waving the flag of the Palestinian cause, and staunchly supporting the “right of return to Palestine,” Hizbullah has been obstructing every attempt to improve the livelihood of Palestinians in Lebanon.

Furthermore, it has been igniting and financing unrest between Palestinian factions, as Hamas is not shy in showcasing its alliance with both Hizbullah and Iran.

Today, while Nasrallah and Hizbullah are considered iconic symbols of the fight against Israel and the defenders of the Palestinian cause, Palestinians in Lebanon are dying young, uneducated and poor, all in the name of preventing them from being naturalized in Lebanon in order to “keep their love for Palestine.”

This tactic for persecuting the Palestinians is not unique to Hizbullah; it has been played by many Arab countries and in fact by some of the countries claiming to be most friendly to the Palestinians.

I wonder how many people outside of Israel are even aware of this. Not enough I'm afraid.

posted by Carl in Jerusalem

Friday, August 6, 2010

Why is Hezbollah Poised at Mexican Border?

As a federal judge gutted Arizona's new immigration law on July 29, the Obama State Department announced that it was "encouraged" by signs that the Arab League would support, or at least not directly impede, direct negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians. Not surprisingly, media seemed not to notice or care how the two things were related. But they are.

One of the most overlooked aspects of the question of immigration is its connection to national security. Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, mentioned that connection on Sean Hannity's Fox News program, but it received very little notice thereafter. Even Arizona's Republican state Sen. Russell Pearce, who wrote the Arizona immigration bill, SB 1070, hasn't spoken of its role in protecting the nation. Yet there is a silver bullet linking the Islamic terror threat with the porous border of Arizona that deserves our immediate attention.

With fresh evidence of Hezbollah activity just south of the border, and numerous reports of Muslims from various countries posing as Mexicans and crossing into the United States from Mexico, our porous southern border is a national security nightmare waiting to happen.

My colleague and coauthor, Robert Spencer, has spoken with people who live along the Arizona border who for years have been finding Korans and Islamic prayer rugs on their property, left by illegal invaders. It is well documented in the Department of Homeland Security's 2008 Yearbook of Immigration Studies, from the Office of Immigration Statistics: Federal law enforcement agencies detained 791,568 deportable aliens in fiscal year 2008, and 5,506 of them were from 14 "special-interest countries" - i.e., nations full of jihadists such as Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan.

Informants are telling us that those numbers continue to swell. But where are these people? What Americans - Arizonans in particular - are not being told is what Immigration Customs Enforcement does with individuals who were detained after illegally entering Arizona from a "special-interest country."

Here is what we do know:

Whenever Arizona law enforcement officials contact Homeland Security about a suspected OTM (Other Than Mexican) they have detained, federal authorities swoop down, cart off the illegal entrant, and tell local officials nothing more about the case. OTMs have utilized sophisticated human smuggling networks to enter the United States from as many as 157 countries around the world - including Iran, Pakistan, Iraq, Afghanistan, Morocco and Egypt.

All this is happening against the backdrop of President Obama's refusal to admit that the global jihad even exists. John Brennan, his counterterrorism adviser, even denies that jihad is a motive for jihadists. Mr. Obama has publicly excoriated Israel, demanded that the Guantanamo Bay detention facility be closed, called for civilian trials of terrorists and embraced Palestinian statehood even if it jeopardizes Israel's security.
Pamela Geller, Washington Post

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Iran Backed and Funded Hezbollah on US Border

Hezb’allah cell rolled up in ... Tijuana [American Thinker]


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2551561/posts for some comments

“Mexican authorities have rolled up a Hezbollah network being built in Tijuana, right across the border from Texas and closer to American homes than the terrorist hideouts in the Bekaa Valley (Lebanon)are to Israel.”

Alan Note: With Islamic Iran building up troops (mostly their Special Forces and Intelligence Agents) and missiles which can reach the USA and their Hezbollah terrorist contingents in Venezuela, only the "deep cover" being provided by the Obama Administration for the jihadists allows their barely covert activity and opens the way for them to infiltrate the USA and add to the violence we can expect when some 50,000 sleeper suicider/homicider cells are activated against us on our soil. Not in Afghanistan or Iraq or elsewhere! Here in America!



July 12, 2010


Hezb'allah cell rolled up in ... Tijuana

Eileen F. Toplansky

As Obama dithers about homeland security and presses on with a lawsuit against Arizona, the terrorists continue to plot this country's destruction. In a Daily News editorial dated July 11, 2010 there is a report that "Mexican authorities have rolled up a Hezbollah network being built in Tijuana, right across the border from Texas [sic] and closer to American homes than the terrorist hideouts in the Bekaa Valley are to Israel.


Surprise, surprise.

This is not the first time that firm evidence points to the infiltration of terrorists coming into the country.

According to a Kuwaiti newspaper, this "Hezbollah network aims to strike targets in Israel and the West." The triangulation of drug money from Mexican cartels and Iranian oil money are behind the financial strength of the terrorists.

Furthermore, "Hezbollah has shadowed the terrorist-sponsoring regime in Tehran, which has been forging close ties with Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, who in turn supports the narcoterrorist organization FARC, which wreaks all kinds of havoc throughout the region."

As Rick Moran has demonstrated, Obama is quite chummy with Chavez.


This president is giving the green light to terrorism with the nuanced words he makes, the actions he takes, and the positions he holds. The bombs are being loaded and aimed at our hearts and he and his Department of Justice ignore the danger to this country.


Eileen can be contacted at middlemarch18@gmail.com

Sunday, April 18, 2010

Syria Has Earned a Place in the Next War



Noah Pollak explains how President Assad's actions this week have ensured him a place in the next Middle East war.

Syria is in fact now in more danger than the Israelis. The IDF’s Arrow missile-defense system can knock Scuds out of the sky with great reliability, so they don’t pose a tremendous a threat. What they do provide to Israel is an opportunity — and they impose a requirement. The fact that they were transferred to Hezbollah in violation of tacit but well-understood red lines gives Israel clear and credible casus belli, should hostilities break out, to expand any conflict to Syria.

The crossing of the Scud-missile red line carries its own inexorable logic: since Syria has chosen to become a provider of military-grade weapons to Hezbollah, Israel has little choice but to include Syria in any future war with Hezbollah. And if Israel goes to war with Syria, there will be little rationale, given the risks involved and the immense reward of ridding the region of Iran’s only ally, from going for regime change.
Israel Matzav

Friday, May 23, 2008

On the Fifth Day of Civil War

The spirit of Pentecost on the fifth day of civil war

Eugene Sensenig-Dabbous / 011.May.08 / 13:00 AM

The besieged Lebanese government called yesterday for a demonstration of solidarity with the victims of the occupation of West Beirut for today, Sunday the 11th, the second highest Christian holiday, celebrating the gift of the Holy Spirit. They called on all Lebanese to express their support for the families who had lost loved one’s to the advancing Iranian backed militias and to take a stand for democracy in Lebanon, by standing for one minute of silence at 12:00 noon.

Dima, Nour and I took the same flag we had held for hours at Martyrs’ Square on the 14th of March, 2005 and headed down to the main secondary road leading from Hazmieh to Beirut, where her family, who is living just off Mar Elias Street, is still being held hostage, along with residents of many other predominantly Sunnis neighbourhoods, by marauding militiamen; this despite the “Opposition’s” promise that their armed forces would be removed from the streets of the capital by this morning.

Reaching the main road, we realized that we were standing in front of the Shi’ia Higher Council building, recently renovated after the last Civil War, but still not in use, vacated except for a few recruits from the Lebanese Army who had the morning shift guarding this impressive massive stone structure. They lazily watched on as Dima unrolled the flag she had so proudly held during the Cedar Revolution, which freed us of Syrian occupation, but has failed to provide full independence to the Arab world’s only existing democracy.

In honor of the occasion, Nour was wearing her brand new labour solidarity bib, “An owie to one, is an owie to all!” a kiddy take on the anarcho-syndicalist slogan “An injury to one, is an injury to all,” which we had just ordered for her from Northland Posters .

We thought this appropriate because this whole “situation” was supposedly to be about the impoverished Lebanese workers and middle class, an issue nobody is talking about anymore.

We were the only ones on the streets of this residential area, who were taking part in this demo. After the moment of silence, we walked around our new neighbourhood, which seemed oblivious to the suffering that was going on just down the hill. There were no Lebanese flags hanging from the balconies, none of our Christian neighbours taking a stand for democracy and in honour of those who had been killed over the last five days of fighting. A car full of fashionably dressed young women did stop and ask for directs. They were curious about the flag; when we explained it was in support of occupied West Beirut they exclaimed “How cute!” When Dima added that is was also in honour of the largely civilian victims of the siege, including three members of her own family, they sobered up and expressed their condolences and drove off.

What I only found out a few hours after I wrote my first open letter is that a male cousin of Dima’s father has lost his wife and two of his four sons in the battle for Beirut. They lived just around the corner from our former Mohammed el Hout Street apartment, in Ras al Nabeh, and had divided up the family in two cars in order to flee the approaching Hezbollah and Amal forces. A RPG hit the car the mother was driving, killing her immediately and mortally wounding her son. As two of their adults sons ran to help them they were mowed down in cold blood by the Shi’ia militias. It is important to note here that there was no TV footage shown of the civilian casualties and the names of the victims have not yet been made public.

As you probably have heard, fighting has now spread throughout the country. In Tripoli and Akkar in the north, Sunnis are fighting and killing Alawites and vice versa. Hezbollah and the Druze PSP have been settling scores in the Chouf Mountains just east of Beirut, including heavy shelling. Muslim-on-Muslim, Sunni-Shi’ia violence has broken out in the ancient cities of Sidon and Tyre in the south and the Bekaa Valley near the Syrian border. The way it looks now, things will be getting a lot worse before they get any better; the dieing continues. To date, the minority Christian population and the Palestinians have managed to stay out of the fighting. However, with would-be president General Michel Auon gloating on TV yesterday about the successful siege of Beirut having “put the cart back on the right track” and that we can now return to business as usual, it seems to be only a matter of time before his predominantly Maronite Free Patriotic Movement starts taking some flack from the utterly humiliated Sunni and Druze population.

One final political note, in closing, about the new confessionalism that has started showing itself over the last few days. During yesterday’s press corps demo in solidarity with the Future journalists, whose pro-Hariri TV, radio and newspaper outlets were sacked and burned by the militias, the regionally renowned television talk show host, Zaven Kouyoumdjian, stated publicly that he had given up on his anti-confessionalist stance and realized, because of the events in Beirut, that one can only count on one’s own confession. People are now being forced, many times against their will, back into their religiously dominated sectarian camps for protection. This has often heartbreaking personal consequences.

I close with an email I received from one of my Sunni students, who fled to her village immediately before the worst fighting broke out.

When we arrived home I went to my room and called my boyfriend to tell him that I arrived home. He answered my call and was happy that I’m safe at home, I asked him why you didn’t contact me in the last 24 hours and why you didn’t answer my calls, he said that he was busy preparing for war, and I was like what are you talking about, he said yes Al Said Hassan Nasrallah said it in his speech, those who will hurt us we’ll cut their hands and all what he said….(I’m sure you heard his speech).

I’ve been with my boyfriend over 2 years, we never talked politics because he didn’t like politics, and he used to tell me that it’s a big game that you and me are not able to understand. But today he called me “you Sunni”………….
For those of you reading this from outside the country and who are religiously inclined, pray that the Holy Spirit might fill the combatants and give them the strength to find their way out of this entanglement.

Faith in the power of the Holy Spirit does unite us all here in the region, Jews, Christians and Muslims. To my knowledge, the only mention of Hezbollah in the Koran is in reference to those strengthened by the Spirit of God. In all three Abrahamic traditions God instructs us to return good for evil and that through his Spirit we will find the strength to overcome both fear and hate.

58:22 It is they in whose hearts He has inscribed faith, and whom He has strength­ened with His Spirit, and whom He will admit into gardens through which running waters flow, there to abide. Well pleased is God with them, and well pleased are they with Him. They are the party of God (Hezbollah). It is they, the party of God, who will reach a happy state!

Saturday, May 3, 2008

Islamic Charity Ultimately Trumps West's Firepower

Islamic Charity Ultimately Trumps Western Firepower

Muqtada's biggest battle already won
By Sreeram Chaulia

A new study by the Washington DC-based advocacy organization, Refugees International, reveals that Shi'ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr's militant force, Jaish-al-Mahdi, is the largest social welfare dispenser in Iraq.

It is a tribute to the Mahdi Army's successful adaptation of the model pioneered by Hezbollah in Lebanon. When survival needs of food, water, housing, electricity and protection are in short supply, and the state apparatus is unable or unwilling to come to the rescue of the population, radical non-state actors can exploit the vacuum and step in as provider of last resort.

The quid pro quo here is that the militant outfit's benevolence earns political legitimacy from the poor who bear the brunt of war. In return for rebuilding homes, hospitals, schools and places of worship destroyed by the enemy, the outfit wins fanatical loyalty from its target constituency. Since militant armies rely on guerrilla-style warfare, their core strength lies in mass public approval and participation in their ranks. Popularity is the treasury of a guerrilla movement that sustains it in asymmetrical war against conventionally superior foes. It is arguably as crucial to a militant force as backing from foreign state sponsors.

To be loved by the people on whose behalf an armed struggle is being waged is the dream of revolutionaries. It satisfies their psychological need for confirmation that the armed movement is indeed benefiting those they claim to be emancipating. Self-doubts can be costly for a guerrilla group, opening the door to defections, apostasy or factionalism. The government or foreign invading army against which the struggle is being waged can pounce on any signs of regret or introspection by militants and sow internal splits that can undo an outfit. Steady nurturing of mass popularity is an existential necessity for militant groups to remain cohesive and steadfast to their objectives. Mao Zedong, the classic exponent of people's war, highlighted another important function of cultivating popular support. In his apt metaphor, without the "ocean" of mass sympathy, the "fish" of the revolutionary army would die asphyxiated. However destitute and harassed, slum dwellers or landless laborers can shelter guerrillas on the run, offer local contacts and information, and even join them in battle as an auxiliary force.

In effect, this sets up a symbiotic relationship between militants and their constituents. The former's humanitarian assistance becomes a lifeline for the poor, and the latter's affection becomes the shield for the guerrillas. In insurrection theory, the two-way-street leads to a merger of the party or rebel outfit and its people to the extent that the two become indistinguishable.

The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in Sri Lanka, for instance, use the slogan "LTTE is the Tamil people and the Tamil people are the LTTE". A war on the outfit, by extension, gets interpreted as a war on the people it defends.

The American invasion of Iraq in 2003 and the post-Saddam Hussein chaos created the perfect conditions of desperation in which the Jaish-al-Mahdi rose to astounding prominence.

Although Muqtada's father, Mohammad Sadeq al-Sadr, was a venerable grand ayatollah during Saddam's dictatorship, it was not expected that the son would go on to become a kingmaker in Iraqi politics and a thorn in the flesh for the American occupation forces.

His Mahdi Army, which began as a ragtag band of 500 Shi'ite seminary students to enforce vigilante justice in 2003, now boasts of over 10,000 dedicated mujahideen and millions of lay sympathizers won over by charitable activities.

The rise of this new force is, in many ways, the story of all that went horribly wrong with the American neo-conservative roadmap of remaking the Middle East. While Muqtada would bristle at his description as an "American creation", the fact is his outfit turned into a state-within-a-state thanks to the George W Bush administration's actions since 2003. Had there been no American invasion to topple Saddam and subsequent stationing of foreign troops on Iraqi soil, the world would not have witnessed the phenomenon that the Mahdi Army morphed into.

This observation is seconded by the similar trajectories of two other Islamist guerrilla groups in the Middle East - Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Palestine. Counter-factually, we would not have had these movements if there were no Israeli aggressions on Lebanon or the Palestinian territories. Islamist militancy is essentially reactionary - a spiritual and temporal response to perceived oppression by foreign or homebred enemies. Once the reaction sets in and takes an organized form, it becomes a Janus-faced humanitarian-cum-terrorist machine. On the one hand, the outfit is the very epitome of kindness and Samaritanism to its own people. On the other hand, it strikes fear into the heart of the enemies with alleged Koranic sanction.

The usage of the charity model by Islamists is not limited to the Middle East. When a devastating earthquake shook Pakistan in October 2005, the banned Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) launched its own independent relief efforts, bypassing the corruption and red tape typical of governmental responses to disasters. The visible and efficient services of LeT and its sister religious bodies won instant appreciation among the suffering victims and furthered the sentiment in Pakistan's frontier and Kashmir regions that the government in Islamabad was incapable of succoring its citizens.

The delegitimization of the state, a civic authority mandated to care for its citizens, went in tow with extra legitimization of jihadi ideology among ordinary Pakistanis. As was to be expected in the relief-for-loyalty exchange, LeT operatives took hundreds of orphaned children under its wing for indoctrination in its extensive network of orphanages and madrassas (seminaries). LeT was also found to be offering "employment" to several people who lost their livelihoods in the natural calamity. It was no coincidence that a spate of LeT-ascribed terrorist attacks occurred in India shortly after the earthquake in Pakistan.

While the usage of humanitarian garb to recruit despondent youth for terrorist purposes is not unique to Islamist outfits, the special theological emphasis in Islam on charity (zakaat) is unmatched among world religions. Saudi Arabian charities are particularly notorious for fundraising in the name of social service and channeling enormous sums to wherever there is a jihadi cause to be aided.

The International Islamic Relief Organization, proscribed by the United Nations in 2006, used to be one major outlet of Saudi Arabian zeal for charity that boosted jihad in the Philippines and Indonesia. The al-Rasheed Trust, exposed in 2001, was run by Pakistan's Jaish-i-Muhammad. It was the brainchild of the Inter-Services Intelligence to fudge finances for terrorist attacks in Afghanistan and Indian-administered Kashmir in the guise of social work.

As long as Jaish-al-Mahdi harnesses its religiously enjoined humanitarian image among downtrodden Shi'ites in Baghdad and southern Iraq, no frontal military assaults by the US and Iraqi armies can succeed in displacing Muqtada from his perch as the country's Robin Hood.

Israel is learning this lesson the hard way against its bete noires, Hezbollah and Hamas. Actions like the present blockade of the Gaza Strip, purportedly aimed at weakening terrorist movements, cause humanitarian crises that drive sufferers closer into the embrace of the movements. Punitive expeditions like the military assault on the Jaish-al-Mahdi will likewise exacerbate the protection deficit in Iraq and vindicate the success of the militant social work model.

Sreeram Chaulia is a researcher on international affairs at the Maxwell School of Citizenship in Syracuse, New York.

Source: Asia Times Online

The Real News