Rubbing our faces in the most heinous Islamic attack isn't enough. Now, anyone who dares to be hurt or insulted or offended by a 15 story Ground Zero mega mosque is branded a "racist."
And they lie about everything. It's rich: 250 people attended their rally on the 25th -- uh, more like 50. But you can count on the media to lie for them, just as CBS turned Beck's half a million patriots into 87,000. Whatever.
Check out this latest Lefty/Islamic "initiative." I strongly recommend all readers attend
Created By
Coalition To Stop Islamophobia in America
More Info
The racist attacks on the Park51 community center have made it clear for us that we need to organize and mobilize ourselves to support our Muslim brothers and sisters and stop the rise of Islamophobia in America. On August 22nd, after only three days and a handful of organizers, 250 people successfully countered the racist anti-Muslim protest two blocks away. This was an important first step for our fight in challenging the anti...-mosque attacks.
[...]
For us to be effective in our struggle for justice we need to build a movement that makes a stand that Park51 should not be moved and can de mand that our Muslim communities be able to build mosques without the fear of being singled out and attacked. We urge you to participate, to organize future actions, and plan for stopping the cancerous growth of the movement against our Muslim and Arab communities.See More
Website: http://www.stopislamophobia.org/
Showing posts with label ground zero mosque scam. Show all posts
Showing posts with label ground zero mosque scam. Show all posts
Monday, August 30, 2010
Bad faith at Ground Zero
Fred Dawes said...
This guy is right but the fact is the USA And all other counties and the people of the west do not stand up as one people and remove the enemies of freedom and laws and justice the west is doomed to live in a islam one world hell with evil in all homes and against all human and civil rights our nation the USA Will disappear into a third world hell and it can not be stopped with words or rhat evil word HOPE.
The fellow muslim/third world travelers can only be stopped as the Nazi and japs happen to be stopped by force of arms and by people of the west and the force of light against the evil force of hell.
But that will never happen for one reason the people of the 1930's 1940's had a will the Americans knew what had to be done against evil the people of england understood what evil is and some europeans understood what must be done but this world who so many good people died to make and we who now live it it will piss in the face of our own dead.
Maybe that is justice for our acts of evil against freedom and justice and the rule of law. THIS may be justice for fools and dishonered political leaders and we may have evil coming and mass death of our nations and of our history of the fight for right against wrong, it is sad to see evil win against good and justice.
Comment with Atlas Shrugs
Saturday, August 28, 2010
Ground Zero Muslim Center May Get Public Financing
Treason.
What happened to the separation of church/mosque and state? This is a complete sell-out of the American people by our own government. We are are being subverted by stealth. It's bad enough and wrong that we have been actively funding and participating in mosque construction projects overseas. Now this?
We are bankrupt and we are building mosques in Muslim countries and possibly funding a mega mosque on Ground Zero. We must take our country back. Every American must get involved. The people have lost all control over the process.
Ground Zero Muslim center may get public financing Reuters hat tip Davida
The Muslim center planned near the site of the World Trade Center attack could qualify for tax-free financing, a spokesman for City Comptroller John Liu said on Friday, and Liu is willing to consider approving the public subsidy.
The Democratic comptroller's spokesman, Scott Sieber, said Liu supported the project. The center has sparked an intense debate over U.S. religious freedoms and the sanctity of the Trade Center site, where nearly 3,000 perished in the September 11, 2001 attack.
Thug developer Gamal hopes to raise $70 million through tax-exempt bonds (more in this NY Times puff piece.)
Get to our rally September 11th and fight the enemy within.
What happened to the separation of church/mosque and state? This is a complete sell-out of the American people by our own government. We are are being subverted by stealth. It's bad enough and wrong that we have been actively funding and participating in mosque construction projects overseas. Now this?
We are bankrupt and we are building mosques in Muslim countries and possibly funding a mega mosque on Ground Zero. We must take our country back. Every American must get involved. The people have lost all control over the process.
Ground Zero Muslim center may get public financing Reuters hat tip Davida
The Muslim center planned near the site of the World Trade Center attack could qualify for tax-free financing, a spokesman for City Comptroller John Liu said on Friday, and Liu is willing to consider approving the public subsidy.
The Democratic comptroller's spokesman, Scott Sieber, said Liu supported the project. The center has sparked an intense debate over U.S. religious freedoms and the sanctity of the Trade Center site, where nearly 3,000 perished in the September 11, 2001 attack.
Thug developer Gamal hopes to raise $70 million through tax-exempt bonds (more in this NY Times puff piece.)
Get to our rally September 11th and fight the enemy within.
Tuesday, August 24, 2010
GZMosque Defines Truth as the New Hate Speech
The media frenzy to destroy good, decent Americans who oppose a 15-story mega-mosque on Ground Zero is rabid. Even for them. Despite red flags everywhere and the nationwide grief caused by this grotesque act of Islamic supremacism, why isn't the media doing its job, investigative journalism?
Instead, the morally ill media is in full-on operational smear machine mode in the raging war of ideas, the information battle space, the objective of which is to erect the Ground Zero mega mosque. Tolerance is a crime when applied to evil (Thomas Mann). Whilst the NY Times front page spins interfaith yarns into PR gold faster than Rumpelstiltskin and accords godlike status to Imam Feisal Rauf, new audio surfaces. Here are a couple of soundbites of tolerance:
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf: "We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al Qaida has on its hands of innocent non Muslims. You may remember that the US-led sanctions against Iraq led to the death of over half a million Iraqi children. This has been documented by the United Nations. And when Madeleine Albright, who has become a friend of mine over the last couple of years, when she was Secretary of State and was asked whether this was worth it, said it was worth it.
No mention of the 270 million victims of over a millennium of jihadi wars, land appropriations, cultural annihilation and enslavement. No mention of the recent slaughter by Muslims of Christians, Hindus, Jews, non-believers in Indonesia, Thailand, Ethiopia, Somalia, Philippines, Lebanon, Israel, Russia, China................ no candor, no criticism of Islam.
Imam Feisal: "The West needs to begin to see themselves through the eyes of the Arab and Muslim world, and when you do you will see the predicament that exists within the Muslim community."
On the question of reforming Islam and expunging the texts of the threat doctrine and mandated violence and conquest:
Imam Feisal: On the issue of the reformation, in terms of what is again intended by it, Islam does not need a reformation.
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf: "So men will say: women, you know, they're emotional, ..... whatever, whatever, and women will say: men, they're brutes, insensitive, etcetera, and you have the beginning of a gender conflict. If gender is not what distinguishes us we'll look at skin colouring and say: n#####s or whities, or whatever"
Reverend Al Sharpton was unavailable for comment. Too busy endorsing the Islamic supremacist mosque. Rest assured, the tolerant Imam Rauf will not suffer as Dr. Laura did (and she was making a "word" point, Rauf is using it.)
Imam Feisal: And when we observe terrorism, whether it was done by the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka or by al Qaida or whoever is behind the bombings in London or those in Madrid
Note, when he says about the London and Madrid bombings,that was five days after the London attacks and over a year after Madrid. It was common knowledge who the perps were at that time.
IMAM FEISAL ABDUL RAUF: That's a very common question. In fact, just about two months ago I was interviewed by Barbara Walters, who is doing a special on heaven and she's interviewed suicide bombers who are expecting the embraces of 72 virgins in paradise, and she asked me do women get the same privilege as well, and I answered her telling her: well, the Koran says you shall have whatever your heart desires
And the Imam is conspiracy theorist - 911 was an inside job:
How many of you have seen the documentary: Fahrenheit 911? The vast majority - at least half here. Do you remember the scene of the Iraqi woman whose house was bombed and she was just screaming, "What have they done." Now, I don't know, you don't know Arabic but in Arabic it was extremely powerful. Her house was gone. Her husband, I think, was killed. What wrong did he do? I found myself weeping when I watched that scene and I imagined myself if I were a 15-year old nephew of this deceased man, what would I have felt?
Collateral damage is a nice thing to put on a paper but when the collateral damage is your own uncle or cousin, what passions do these arouse? How do you negotiate? How do you tell people whose homes have been destroyed, whose lives have been destroyed, that this does not justify your actions of terrorism. It's hard. Yes, it is true that it does not justify the acts of bombing innocent civilians, that does not solve the problem, but after 50 years of, in many cases, oppression, of US support of authoritarian regimes that have violated human rights in the most heinous of ways, how else do people get attention?
And while Imam Faisal speaks of tolerance and so forth, he commiserates with worst extremists and inciters to genocide:
IMAM FEISAL ABDUL RAUF: The broader community is in fact criticising and condemning actions of terrorism that are being done in the name of Islam. I just came from a conference in Jordan, Amman where there were over 170 leading Muslim scholars from almost every part of the Muslim world, including some of the most important names like Sheikh Tantawi of Egypt, Sheikh Ali Gomaa, who is the Chief Mufti of Egypt, the Chief Mufti of Jordan, the Sheikh Al-Qaradawi, who is a very very well known Islamic jurist, highly regarded all over the Muslim world.
MAS/ICNA Qatar cleric Yusuf Qaradawi in the UK : 'Give terrorists Apache helicopters so they won't have to blow themselves up'
A Little Plain Talk from GZMosque Imam Rauf
The media frenzy to destroy good, decent Americans who oppose a 15-story mega-mosque on Ground Zero is rabid. Even for them. Despite red flags everywhere and the nationwide grief caused by this grotesque act of Islamic supremacism, why isn't the media doing its job, investigative journalism?
Instead, the morally ill media is in full-on operational smear machine mode in the raging war of ideas, the information battle space, the objective of which is to erect the Ground Zero mega mosque. Tolerance is a crime when applied to evil (Thomas Mann). Whilst the NY Times front page spins interfaith yarns into PR gold faster than Rumpelstiltskin and accords godlike status to Imam Feisal Rauf, new audio surfaces. Here are a couple of soundbites of tolerance:
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf: "We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al Qaida has on its hands of innocent non Muslims. You may remember that the US-led sanctions against Iraq led to the death of over half a million Iraqi children. This has been documented by the United Nations. And when Madeleine Albright, who has become a friend of mine over the last couple of years, when she was Secretary of State and was asked whether this was worth it, said it was worth it.
No mention of the 270 million victims of over a millennium of jihadi wars, land appropriations, cultural annihilation and enslavement. No mention of the recent slaughter by Muslims of Christians, Hindus, Jews, non-believers in Indonesia, Thailand, Ethiopia, Somalia, Philippines, Lebanon, Israel, Russia, China................ no candor, no criticism of Islam.
Imam Feisal: "The West needs to begin to see themselves through the eyes of the Arab and Muslim world, and when you do you will see the predicament that exists within the Muslim community."
On the question of reforming Islam and expunging the texts of the threat doctrine and mandated violence and conquest:
Imam Feisal: On the issue of the reformation, in terms of what is again intended by it, Islam does not need a reformation.
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf: "So men will say: women, you know, they're emotional, ..... whatever, whatever, and women will say: men, they're brutes, insensitive, etcetera, and you have the beginning of a gender conflict. If gender is not what distinguishes us we'll look at skin colouring and say: n#####s or whities, or whatever"
Reverend Al Sharpton was unavailable for comment. Too busy endorsing the Islamic supremacist mosque. Rest assured, the tolerant Imam Rauf will not suffer as Dr. Laura did (and she was making a "word" point, Rauf is using it.)
Imam Feisal: And when we observe terrorism, whether it was done by the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka or by al Qaida or whoever is behind the bombings in London or those in Madrid
Note, when he says about the London and Madrid bombings,that was five days after the London attacks and over a year after Madrid. It was common knowledge who the perps were at that time.
IMAM FEISAL ABDUL RAUF: That's a very common question. In fact, just about two months ago I was interviewed by Barbara Walters, who is doing a special on heaven and she's interviewed suicide bombers who are expecting the embraces of 72 virgins in paradise, and she asked me do women get the same privilege as well, and I answered her telling her: well, the Koran says you shall have whatever your heart desires
And the Imam is conspiracy theorist - 911 was an inside job:
How many of you have seen the documentary: Fahrenheit 911? The vast majority - at least half here. Do you remember the scene of the Iraqi woman whose house was bombed and she was just screaming, "What have they done." Now, I don't know, you don't know Arabic but in Arabic it was extremely powerful. Her house was gone. Her husband, I think, was killed. What wrong did he do? I found myself weeping when I watched that scene and I imagined myself if I were a 15-year old nephew of this deceased man, what would I have felt?
Collateral damage is a nice thing to put on a paper but when the collateral damage is your own uncle or cousin, what passions do these arouse? How do you negotiate? How do you tell people whose homes have been destroyed, whose lives have been destroyed, that this does not justify your actions of terrorism. It's hard. Yes, it is true that it does not justify the acts of bombing innocent civilians, that does not solve the problem, but after 50 years of, in many cases, oppression, of US support of authoritarian regimes that have violated human rights in the most heinous of ways, how else do people get attention?
And while Imam Faisal speaks of tolerance and so forth, he commiserates with worst extremists and inciters to genocide:
IMAM FEISAL ABDUL RAUF: The broader community is in fact criticising and condemning actions of terrorism that are being done in the name of Islam. I just came from a conference in Jordan, Amman where there were over 170 leading Muslim scholars from almost every part of the Muslim world, including some of the most important names like Sheikh Tantawi of Egypt, Sheikh Ali Gomaa, who is the Chief Mufti of Egypt, the Chief Mufti of Jordan, the Sheikh Al-Qaradawi, who is a very very well known Islamic jurist, highly regarded all over the Muslim world.
Instead, the morally ill media is in full-on operational smear machine mode in the raging war of ideas, the information battle space, the objective of which is to erect the Ground Zero mega mosque. Tolerance is a crime when applied to evil (Thomas Mann). Whilst the NY Times front page spins interfaith yarns into PR gold faster than Rumpelstiltskin and accords godlike status to Imam Feisal Rauf, new audio surfaces. Here are a couple of soundbites of tolerance:
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf: "We tend to forget, in the West, that the United States has more Muslim blood on its hands than al Qaida has on its hands of innocent non Muslims. You may remember that the US-led sanctions against Iraq led to the death of over half a million Iraqi children. This has been documented by the United Nations. And when Madeleine Albright, who has become a friend of mine over the last couple of years, when she was Secretary of State and was asked whether this was worth it, said it was worth it.
No mention of the 270 million victims of over a millennium of jihadi wars, land appropriations, cultural annihilation and enslavement. No mention of the recent slaughter by Muslims of Christians, Hindus, Jews, non-believers in Indonesia, Thailand, Ethiopia, Somalia, Philippines, Lebanon, Israel, Russia, China................ no candor, no criticism of Islam.
Imam Feisal: "The West needs to begin to see themselves through the eyes of the Arab and Muslim world, and when you do you will see the predicament that exists within the Muslim community."
On the question of reforming Islam and expunging the texts of the threat doctrine and mandated violence and conquest:
Imam Feisal: On the issue of the reformation, in terms of what is again intended by it, Islam does not need a reformation.
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf: "So men will say: women, you know, they're emotional, ..... whatever, whatever, and women will say: men, they're brutes, insensitive, etcetera, and you have the beginning of a gender conflict. If gender is not what distinguishes us we'll look at skin colouring and say: n#####s or whities, or whatever"
Reverend Al Sharpton was unavailable for comment. Too busy endorsing the Islamic supremacist mosque. Rest assured, the tolerant Imam Rauf will not suffer as Dr. Laura did (and she was making a "word" point, Rauf is using it.)
Imam Feisal: And when we observe terrorism, whether it was done by the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka or by al Qaida or whoever is behind the bombings in London or those in Madrid
Note, when he says about the London and Madrid bombings,that was five days after the London attacks and over a year after Madrid. It was common knowledge who the perps were at that time.
IMAM FEISAL ABDUL RAUF: That's a very common question. In fact, just about two months ago I was interviewed by Barbara Walters, who is doing a special on heaven and she's interviewed suicide bombers who are expecting the embraces of 72 virgins in paradise, and she asked me do women get the same privilege as well, and I answered her telling her: well, the Koran says you shall have whatever your heart desires
And the Imam is conspiracy theorist - 911 was an inside job:
How many of you have seen the documentary: Fahrenheit 911? The vast majority - at least half here. Do you remember the scene of the Iraqi woman whose house was bombed and she was just screaming, "What have they done." Now, I don't know, you don't know Arabic but in Arabic it was extremely powerful. Her house was gone. Her husband, I think, was killed. What wrong did he do? I found myself weeping when I watched that scene and I imagined myself if I were a 15-year old nephew of this deceased man, what would I have felt?
Collateral damage is a nice thing to put on a paper but when the collateral damage is your own uncle or cousin, what passions do these arouse? How do you negotiate? How do you tell people whose homes have been destroyed, whose lives have been destroyed, that this does not justify your actions of terrorism. It's hard. Yes, it is true that it does not justify the acts of bombing innocent civilians, that does not solve the problem, but after 50 years of, in many cases, oppression, of US support of authoritarian regimes that have violated human rights in the most heinous of ways, how else do people get attention?
And while Imam Faisal speaks of tolerance and so forth, he commiserates with worst extremists and inciters to genocide:
IMAM FEISAL ABDUL RAUF: The broader community is in fact criticising and condemning actions of terrorism that are being done in the name of Islam. I just came from a conference in Jordan, Amman where there were over 170 leading Muslim scholars from almost every part of the Muslim world, including some of the most important names like Sheikh Tantawi of Egypt, Sheikh Ali Gomaa, who is the Chief Mufti of Egypt, the Chief Mufti of Jordan, the Sheikh Al-Qaradawi, who is a very very well known Islamic jurist, highly regarded all over the Muslim world.
The Post American Presidecy: Obama's War on USA
Christian Toto over at Human Events has done a review of my book. Here's an excerpt of the review for The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration's War on America: - Pamela Geller
The media did their best—and still do—to downplay Obama’s radical ties. But this book argues that in probing the President’s anti-Israel bent it doesn’t take much sleuthing to uncover names such as Wright, Bill Ayers, Khalid al-Mansour, Rashid Khalidi and many others of a similar bent. And what about Robert Malley, whom Obama named a key foreign policy advisor? Malley had met with representatives from Hamas and held entrenched anti-Israel views, facts that forced Obama to let him go—temporarily.
Obama’s stance toward Iran, a rogue regime tinkering with its own nuclear program, falls right in line with his inability to use American force—even soft power—in an effective manner. When many Iranian people rose up against the country’s crooked elections, Obama said next to nothing to support them. The mullahs laughed, slaughtered some of the protestors and refueled their nuclear ambitions.
“Iran was clearly emboldened by Barack Obama’s weakness—at the worst possible time for it to be emboldened,” they write. “Obama believed that simply by showing the Iranians some love, he could persuade them to drop their genocidal bellicosity and join the ranks of free nations.”
The President can’t even wage a war for which he long argued was essential to the country’s safety. The President famously dithered for months on a plan to boost U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan and, when he finally came to a decision, it included a withdrawal date, a measure sure to delight Taliban leaders.
Obama often leans on hard, cold fiction to support his international bent. He recast American history to let Islam take a greater part in it while the suppliant media remained silent. When the facts proved without a doubt that the Fort Hood shooter was motivated by radical Islam he couldn’t bring himself to admit that reality.
That Obama weakness matters. Just consider the spate of attempted terrorist attacks against U.S. interests in the late summer and early fall of 2009.
The President’s stance on freedom of speech remains equally shoddy. His followers flooded a Chicago radio station in the run-up to his election to help silence one of his critics, and Obama stood silent while his defenders trotted out the race card to smite any valid criticism of the President or his policies.
The administration’s brief assault on Fox News was simply another part of its strategy to strangle free speech—or any speech that clashes with its post-American worldview.
During the 2008 presidential election season, the Obama team hid a gaggle of his personal records to prevent people from realizing his true nature.
The Post-American Presidency spells out Obama’s radicalism in black and white for all to see—and fear.
The media did their best—and still do—to downplay Obama’s radical ties. But this book argues that in probing the President’s anti-Israel bent it doesn’t take much sleuthing to uncover names such as Wright, Bill Ayers, Khalid al-Mansour, Rashid Khalidi and many others of a similar bent. And what about Robert Malley, whom Obama named a key foreign policy advisor? Malley had met with representatives from Hamas and held entrenched anti-Israel views, facts that forced Obama to let him go—temporarily.
Obama’s stance toward Iran, a rogue regime tinkering with its own nuclear program, falls right in line with his inability to use American force—even soft power—in an effective manner. When many Iranian people rose up against the country’s crooked elections, Obama said next to nothing to support them. The mullahs laughed, slaughtered some of the protestors and refueled their nuclear ambitions.
“Iran was clearly emboldened by Barack Obama’s weakness—at the worst possible time for it to be emboldened,” they write. “Obama believed that simply by showing the Iranians some love, he could persuade them to drop their genocidal bellicosity and join the ranks of free nations.”
The President can’t even wage a war for which he long argued was essential to the country’s safety. The President famously dithered for months on a plan to boost U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan and, when he finally came to a decision, it included a withdrawal date, a measure sure to delight Taliban leaders.
Obama often leans on hard, cold fiction to support his international bent. He recast American history to let Islam take a greater part in it while the suppliant media remained silent. When the facts proved without a doubt that the Fort Hood shooter was motivated by radical Islam he couldn’t bring himself to admit that reality.
That Obama weakness matters. Just consider the spate of attempted terrorist attacks against U.S. interests in the late summer and early fall of 2009.
The President’s stance on freedom of speech remains equally shoddy. His followers flooded a Chicago radio station in the run-up to his election to help silence one of his critics, and Obama stood silent while his defenders trotted out the race card to smite any valid criticism of the President or his policies.
The administration’s brief assault on Fox News was simply another part of its strategy to strangle free speech—or any speech that clashes with its post-American worldview.
During the 2008 presidential election season, the Obama team hid a gaggle of his personal records to prevent people from realizing his true nature.
The Post-American Presidency spells out Obama’s radicalism in black and white for all to see—and fear.
Friday, August 20, 2010
Using the GZMosque for Purposes of Extortion
Blackmailing America.
911 attack, part II: trafficking/profiting in the pain of a nation.
As the obvious ultimate insult becomes more painful, and the polls overwhelmingly oppose the Ground Zero mosque, thug developer Sharif El Gamal et al are dictating the terms (the booty) for taking Ground Zero hostage with an Islamic supremacist mosque on the site of the 911 attack.
Geraldo Rivera (the clownish messenger) is on O'Reilly, showing off that he is on the inside with Muslims in the know, wink, wink, nod nod, as a compromise is being hammered out with these stealth jihadists.
According to Geraldo's inside jizz, a "major [Muslim] 'civil rights activist' close to the prime developer" -- (uh, can you say Hamas-linked, Muslim Brotherhood proxy?) dictates the terms as follows.
* If they are to be paid off, they expect at least four times what they paid for the Burlington property. (Nice, huh?)
* If it's a property switch, it must be a "better commercial value in the immediate vicinity" of Ground Zero, south of Houston street and perhaps east of Broadway.
Exploiting 911. Ugh.
It is galling that we the taxpayers are going to pay a jizya for this stealth jihadist to do the decent and moral thing.
Apparently this crew is capable of neither decency nor morality.
It is tempting to want to negotiate this terrible "attack" away, but it's like negotiating with terrorists. It will set a very bad precedent -- city funded mosques or state sponsored Islam.
This is wrong. They are wrong. They should not be rewarded. The taxpayer should not pay this ransom.
"Jiyza: From the point of view of the Muslim rulers, jizya was a material proof of the non-Muslims' acceptance of subjection to the state and its laws, 'just as for the inhabitants it was a concrete continuation of the taxes paid to earlier regimes.'"[6]]
Atlas Shrugs
911 attack, part II: trafficking/profiting in the pain of a nation.
As the obvious ultimate insult becomes more painful, and the polls overwhelmingly oppose the Ground Zero mosque, thug developer Sharif El Gamal et al are dictating the terms (the booty) for taking Ground Zero hostage with an Islamic supremacist mosque on the site of the 911 attack.
Geraldo Rivera (the clownish messenger) is on O'Reilly, showing off that he is on the inside with Muslims in the know, wink, wink, nod nod, as a compromise is being hammered out with these stealth jihadists.
According to Geraldo's inside jizz, a "major [Muslim] 'civil rights activist' close to the prime developer" -- (uh, can you say Hamas-linked, Muslim Brotherhood proxy?) dictates the terms as follows.
* If they are to be paid off, they expect at least four times what they paid for the Burlington property. (Nice, huh?)
* If it's a property switch, it must be a "better commercial value in the immediate vicinity" of Ground Zero, south of Houston street and perhaps east of Broadway.
Exploiting 911. Ugh.
It is galling that we the taxpayers are going to pay a jizya for this stealth jihadist to do the decent and moral thing.
Apparently this crew is capable of neither decency nor morality.
It is tempting to want to negotiate this terrible "attack" away, but it's like negotiating with terrorists. It will set a very bad precedent -- city funded mosques or state sponsored Islam.
This is wrong. They are wrong. They should not be rewarded. The taxpayer should not pay this ransom.
"Jiyza: From the point of view of the Muslim rulers, jizya was a material proof of the non-Muslims' acceptance of subjection to the state and its laws, 'just as for the inhabitants it was a concrete continuation of the taxes paid to earlier regimes.'"[6]]
Atlas Shrugs
Thursday, August 12, 2010
68% of Americans Oppose Ground Zero Mosque
CNN (!) Poll: Close 70% of Americans Oppose the Ground Zero Mosque
Let's do a poll on how many Americans would poll if they knew that the U.S. government's was paying for the the Ground Zero Mosque Imam Rauf's Middle East tour. Yeah, right, he's not fund raising for the mosque. Whose monitoring his meetings?
The Islamic supremacists contempt for the American people is grotesque and typical.
CNN Poll: 68% of American Voters Oppose Ground Zero Mosque Weekly Standard hat tip Dan F
CNN polls registered voters on the Ground Zero mosque:
As you may know, a group of Muslims in the U.S. plan to build a mosque two blocks from the site in New York City where the World Trade Center used to stand. Do you favor or oppose this plan?
The response:
Favor 29%
Oppose 68%
No opinion 3%
So, according to the Center for American Progress, two out of every three voters are un-American bigots.
I can only imagine that voters would be even more opposed to the U.S. government's funding of the Ground Zero Mosque imam's Middle East junket.
Let's do a poll on how many Americans would poll if they knew that the U.S. government's was paying for the the Ground Zero Mosque Imam Rauf's Middle East tour. Yeah, right, he's not fund raising for the mosque. Whose monitoring his meetings?
The Islamic supremacists contempt for the American people is grotesque and typical.
CNN Poll: 68% of American Voters Oppose Ground Zero Mosque Weekly Standard hat tip Dan F
CNN polls registered voters on the Ground Zero mosque:
As you may know, a group of Muslims in the U.S. plan to build a mosque two blocks from the site in New York City where the World Trade Center used to stand. Do you favor or oppose this plan?
The response:
Favor 29%
Oppose 68%
No opinion 3%
So, according to the Center for American Progress, two out of every three voters are un-American bigots.
I can only imagine that voters would be even more opposed to the U.S. government's funding of the Ground Zero Mosque imam's Middle East junket.
Tuesday, August 10, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
